Page History

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

BRIEF

Policy Summary

This policy describes the requirements for funds control at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab). It also defines the guidelines for initiating the

...

Stop Work process

...

to ensure compliance with

...

these funds control requirements.

Who Should Read This Policy

Any

Who Should Read This Policy

...

Berkeley Lab employee with financial or project management responsibilities

To Read the Full Policy, Go To:

The POLICY tab on this wiki page

Contact Information

Budget Officer

...

Field

...

Finance Manager

...

End Brief

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

POLICY

A. Purpose

This policy

...

describes the

...

requirements for funds control at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab

...

). It also defines the guidelines for initiating the Stop Work process to ensure compliance with

...

B. Persons Affected

Any Berkeley Lab employee with financial responsibilities

C. Exceptions

D. Policy Statement

...

1. DOE Direct-Funded Work
   1. Costs and/or commitments incurred in excess of funds available
   2. Costs and/or commitments incurred prior to receipt of funds in the Contract Modification (Mod)
   3. Costs and/or commitments incurred for activities outside of the purpose specified in the DOE work authorization
   4. Costs and/or commitments incurred after the expiration of limited-appropriation funds
2. Work for Others (WFO)
   1. Costs incurred prior to receipt of an accepted reimbursable work agreement. A written agreement to perform work or provide a service for another federal agency or non-federal sponsor, signed by a contracting officer or an official with delegated authority to commit the Laboratory to perform WFO, and approved by an authorized approver of the sponsor.
   2. Costs incurred prior to receipt of DOE Approval.
   3. Costs incurred outside the reimbursable work agreement period of performance
   4. Costs incurred after the expiration of limited-appropriation funds
   5. Costs incurred outside of the reimbursable work agreement terms (Statement of Work). Activities must be allowable and allocable.
   6. Costs incurred in excess of funding
      1. For a federal reimbursable work agreement, "funding" is defined as the contract value.
      2. For a non-federal reimbursable work agreement, "funding" is defined as cash received (advance payments + invoice payments), plus approved bridge funding.
   7. Financial terms of reimbursable work agreement are not met by the sponsor
      1. Delinquent payment of invoices (generally invoices outstanding for 120 days or more)
      2. Sponsor refuses to reimburse the Laboratory

...

1. A potential funds-control violation may be identified by a division resource analyst, business manager, accounts receivable manager, Office of Sponsored Projects and Industry Partnerships (OSPIP) Contracts Officer, manager, Budget Office analyst, etc., and may result in the initiation of a Stop Work process (refer to Stop Work Process Flowchart). If a potential funds-control violation is identified, the identifier must notify the following individuals via e-mail:

   POSITION	NOTIFICATION
   Field Operations Manager	Mandatory
   Division Resource Analyst	Mandatory
   Budget Office Analyst	Mandatory
   Business Manager	Mandatory
   Division Director/Deputy Director	Division discretion
   Principal Investigator (PI)	Division discretion
   OSPIP Contracts Officer	If applicable
   Accounts Receivable Manager	If applicable
   Budget Officer	Field operations manager discretion

2. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has the option of declaring a temporary Stop Work at any time during this process.

...

1. The field operations manager establishes and facilitates a fact-finding team within two business days of receipt of notification in order to gather details and explore whether other funding sources are available and appropriate. The team should include those individuals noted as mandatory under the initial notification section, and others as appropriate. Based on the team's findings, a recommendation is made.
2. If the team determines that a Stop Work course of action is unnecessary, the division resource analyst and field operations manager must still complete a Stop Work Initiation Form, summarizing the issue and the team's recommendation. The completed form is distributed by the field operations manager to the team for informational purposes.
3. If the team recommends a Stop Work course of action, the division resource analyst and field operations manager complete the Stop Work Initiation Form, summarizing the team's recommendation and outlining the funding alternatives that were explored but determined not to be viable options. The Budget Office reviews the completed form.
4. The field operations manager distributes the completed form simultaneously to the division's business manager and to the Budget Officer. The business manager reviews the Stop Work recommendation with the division director and notifies the Budget Officer if there are additional concerns prior to the CFO review. The Budget Officer reviews the recommendation with the CFO for final determination.
5. Given the severity of a Stop Work situation, the determination process should be completed expeditiously.

...

1. If a Stop Work is the recommended course of action, the CFO reviews the issues with the division director, or designee. The division director is responsible for implementing the Stop Work. The Stop Work status is in effect until the funds-control violation is resolved.
2. Once the division director concurs with the Stop Work recommendation, the sponsor will be notified. The OSPIP officer will handle the formal sponsor notification for WFO, and the division director for DOE direct-funded projects.

...

these funds control requirements.

B. Persons Affected

Any Berkeley Lab employee with financial or project management responsibilities

C. Exceptions

This policy includes guidance for stopping work to prevent a funds control violation. This guidance provides a collaborative approach between the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) and the area/division experiencing a potential funds control violation designed to investigate the issue and come to a joint resolution as quickly as possible. If warranted by the severity of the risk, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Deputy CFO, and/or Budget Officer have the authority to bypass the steps described in this policy and unilaterally stop or suspend work. This action will be immediately followed by the evaluation steps described below in Section D.4. They can exercise this authority in order to mitigate risk to the Laboratory while supporting its scientific mission.
Other non-financial factors may also result in the requirement to stop work. These factors are covered in other policies.

D. Policy

1. General
   1. The scope of this policy applies to work funded through Contract 31. This includes activities funded by the Department of Energy (DOE), Strategic Partnership Projects (SPP) sponsors, and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs).
   2. DOE and other sponsors fund the work of Berkeley Lab. The funds for authorized activities are included in Contract 31 through the Authorized Funding Plan (AFP) contract modifications. These funds are subject to limitations related to the authorized scope of work, the timing of funds receipts, and the period of performance.
      1. For projects funded by DOE, the work authorization describing the work to be performed, along with the associated funds (the AFP), must be received at the Laboratory before starting work.
      2. For a federal SPP agreement, work may commence after a fully executed contract is awarded, the period of performance is in effect, and funds have been received at the Laboratory. The Laboratory may elect to, at its own risk, utilize bridge funding to begin work prior to all of these requirements being met.
      3. For a non-federal SPP agreement, work may commence after a fully executed contract is awarded, a cash advance has been requested and received, the period of performance is in effect, and funds have been received at the Laboratory. The Laboratory may elect to, at its own risk, use bridge funding to begin work prior to all of these requirements being met. Non-federal SPP agreement funds are limited to the cash received from the sponsor. In some cases, a project may continue to incur costs in excess of cash received with approved bridge funding (see the Bridge Funding Policy for details).
   3. Funds control is a process to ensure that:
      1. Funds are expended solely for their authorized and appropriated purpose.
      2. Funds are obligated and expended within their authorized amounts.
      3. Costs and encumbrances are incurred within applicable time limits.
         1. Funds must be received at the Laboratory before being spent or encumbered.
         2. Costs and encumbrances may only be expended during the authorized period of performance.
   4. Projects must be managed to ensure that costs and encumbrances do not exceed the funds available at Berkeley Lab. A funds control violation occurs when costs and encumbrances are incurred in excess of funds included on the contract at the funds control level. Examples of funds control violations are detailed below in Section D.2.
   5. If a funds control violation is likely to occur, the area/division should work with its designated Field Finance Team and the Budget Office to determine mitigating actions, such as requesting additional funds from the sponsor or the use of bridge funding on SPP awards. If all mitigating actions have been exhausted, the Stop Work process described below in

      Anchor
      secD4 secD4

      Section D.4 should be initiated.
   6. If it is determined that an actual funds-control violation exists, per the process outlined in Section D.4, work activities must stop until the issue is resolved.

1. Anchor
   secD2 secD2

   Examples of Funds Control Violations: Possible funds control violations may include:
   1. DOE Direct-Funded Work
      1. Costs and/or encumbrances incurred in excess of funds available.
      2. Costs and/or encumbrances incurred prior to receipt of funds through the Authorized Funding Plan (AFP) contract modification.
      3. Costs and/or encumbrances incurred for activities outside the purpose specified in the DOE work authorization.
      4. Costs and/or encumbrances incurred after the expiration of limited-appropriation funds.
   2. Sponsored Research Work
      1. Costs incurred prior to the receipt of an accepted reimbursable work agreement (e.g., a written agreement to perform work or provide a service for another federal agency or non-federal sponsor, signed by a contracting officer or an authorized business official with delegated authority to commit Berkeley Lab to perform sponsored research, and approved by an authorized approver of the sponsor).
      2. Costs incurred prior to receipt of DOE approval.
      3. Costs incurred outside the reimbursable work agreement period of performance.
      4. Costs incurred after the expiration of limited-appropriation funds, if applicable, on work for non-DOE federal sponsors.
      5. Costs incurred outside the reimbursable work agreement terms (statement of work). Activities must be allowable and allocable.
      6. Costs incurred in excess of funding.
         1. For a federal reimbursable work agreement, "funding" is defined as the contract value.
         2. For a non-federal reimbursable work agreement, "funding" is defined as cash received (advance payments + invoice payments), plus bridge funding.
      7. The financial terms of a reimbursable work agreement are not met by the sponsor.
      8. The delinquent payment of invoices (generally invoices outstanding for 120 days or more).
      9. The sponsor refuses to reimburse the Laboratory.

The violations described above could result in uncollectible or unallowable costs for Berkeley Lab. Accordingly, it is important to monitor funds to prevent these types of issues from occurring.

1. Responsibility for Monitoring Costs
   1. The Principal Investigator/Project Manager (PI/PM) has the primary responsibility to ensure that project costs are managed so that costs and encumbrances do not exceed funds available for the project.
   2. The Resource Analyst (RA) matrixed to the division is responsible for providing data that enables the PI/PM to effectively monitor the costs/encumbrances on the project.
   3. The area/division leadership is responsible for assuring funds control processes are in place and being followed. The area/division leadership may assign responsibilities for providing support to the PI/PM in monitoring costs and assuring funds control to its Business Managers or Operations Deputies.
   4. The PI/PM and RA should collaborate to monitor costs and encumbrances on an ongoing basis to identify projects that are at risk of exceeding available funding in a timely manner. Monitoring should take into consideration the availability of funds for the next 90 days in comparison with the timing of costs/encumbrances, including long lead material and future travel costs.
   5. If there is the risk of a funds control violation within 90 days, the division should work with its designated Field Finance Manager to take mitigating actions.

1. Process for Initiating Stop Work for Funds Control Compliance

The Stop Work process is initiated only after all other appropriate mitigating actions have been taken to prevent a funds control violation. An overview of the process for stopping work based on funds control issues is shown below.

1. 1. Initial Notification

      Anchor
      _GoBack _GoBack

A potential funds-control violation may be identified by any individual with a fiduciary responsibility, including an RA, Division Business Manager, Division Deputy of Operations, Reimbursable Group (RG) Manager, Innovation and Partnerships Office (IPO) Manager, IPO Contracts Officer, RG Contracts Officer, Budget Office Analyst, etc., and may result in the initiation of a Stop Work process (refer to the Stop Work Process Flowchart above).

If a potential funds-control violation is identified, the identifier must notify the designated Field Finance Manager for the area via email.

1. 1. Determination
      1. The designated Field Finance Manager establishes and facilitates a fact-finding team within two business days of receipt of notification in order to gather details and explore whether other funding sources are available and appropriate. The team should include those individuals noted as mandatory below, and others as appropriate. Based on the team's findings, a recommendation is made.

         POSITION	COMMUNICATION
         Field Finance Department Head	Mandatory
         Resource Analyst (RA) (matrixed to the division)	Mandatory
         Budget Office Manager	Mandatory
         Business Manager/Deputy Director	Mandatory
         Division Director	Discretionary
         Principal Investigator (PI)	Mandatory
         Contracts Officer (IPO or RG)	If applicable
         Budget Officer	Discretionary
         Innovation and Partnership Office Manager	If applicable

      2. If the team determines that a Stop Work course of action is unnecessary, the RA and designated Field Finance Manager must summarize the issue, distribute to the team, and solicit the team's recommendation.
      3. If the team recommends a Stop Work course of action, the RA and designated Field Finance Manager will communicate to the Budget Office the team's recommendation and outline the funding alternatives that were explored but determined not to be viable options.
      4. The designated Field Finance Manager will simultaneously communicate with the division's Business Manager and/or the Division Deputy of Operations and to the Budget Officer. The Business Manager reviews the Stop Work recommendation with the Division Director and notifies the Budget Officer if there are additional concerns prior to the CFO review. The Budget Officer, along with the Field Finance Manager, reviews the recommendation with the CFO for final determination.
      5. Given the severity of a Stop Work situation, the determination process should be completed expeditiously.
   2. Stop Work Notification
      1. If a Stop Work is the recommended course of action, the CFO or designee reviews the issues with the Division Director or designee. The Division Director is responsible for implementing the Stop Work. The Stop Work status is in effect until the funds-control violation is resolved.
      2. Once the Division Director concurs with the Stop Work recommendation, the sponsor will be notified. The Contracts Officer will handle the formal sponsor notification for sponsored research, and the Division Director for DOE direct-funded projects.
      3. If warranted by the severity of risk, the CFO, Deputy CFO, and/or Budget Officer have the authority to bypass the steps described above and unilaterally stop or suspend work. Exercising this authority will be immediately followed by the evaluation steps described above in Section D.4. They can exercise this authority (at their discretion) to mitigate risk to the Laboratory while supporting its scientific mission.
   3. Resource Allocation
      1. Since activities on the project at issue must cease:
         1. The Budget Office Analyst will place the project in "Costs Are Final" to prevent any further charges to the project until the issue has been resolved.
         2. The PI's and staff's effort must be redirected to another appropriate activity, such as work on other benefitting projects or employee-between-assignment activities funded through area or organizational burdens, if applicable. It is inappropriate to charge research and development costs to area and organizational burdens (see the Organization Burden policy). Therefore, if alternatives are unavailable, the division must pursue appropriate action

...

1. 1. 1. 1. with Human Resources (e.g., administrative leave, termination, etc.).
      2. In cases of abrupt funding termination, the division may seek non-Contract 31 funds (e.g., Fee

...

1. 1. 1. ).

E. Roles and Responsibilities

F. Definitions/Acronyms

G. Recordkeeping Requirements

None

H. Implementing Documents

None

I. Contact Information

Budget Officer Field Finance Manager

J. Revision History

Remove this text after wiki tabs are set. End Policy.

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Source Requirements Documents

• Department of Energy Accounting Handbook, Chapter 2, Administrative Control of Funds
• [DOE Order 481.1D, Strategic Partnership Projects [Formerly Known as Work for Others (Non-Department of Energy Funded Work)]

• https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0481.1-BOrder-d/@@images/file]Principles of Federal Appropriations Law

Implementing Documents

None
Remove this text after wiki tabs are set. End Document Info.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Image Removed

E. Roles and Responsibilities

F. Definitions/Acronyms

G. Recordkeeping Requirements

None

H. Implementing Documents

I. Contact Information

Budget Officer
Field Operations Manager

J. Revision History

...

...

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

...

Title:

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Key labels/tags:

...

• (Policy Area 1), (Policy Area 2), (Section)

New terms that need to be added to Glossary/Acronym list:

• (list items not found and context (Policy Area name) – full definition would be included in Policy)

Implementing Documents restricted to department/functional use

(optional – these will be used for tracing between requirements and associated documents)

...

Side bars:
Side bar 1 location (cite by Policy Section # - for example: Section D.2.a)
Sidebar 1 text:
Sidebar 2 location
Sidebar 2 text:
Sidebar 3 location
Sidebar 3 text:
Remove this text after establishing wiki tabs End Additional Information