{dojo-tabs:theme=tundra}
{dojo-tab:title=Brief|selected=true}
|Title:|Security for Information Technology|
|Publication date:| Card |
---|
| Title: | Security for Information Technology | Publication date: |
| |
| ||
h2.BRIEF
h3.Policy Summary
This policy describes security responsibilities and requirements for Laboratory Information Technology This policy describes security responsibilities and requirements for Laboratory Information Technology (IT). |
*
*
*
*
h3.
*
*
h3.
h3.
[|mailto:[email protected]]
{dojo-tab}
{dojo-tab:title=Policy}
|Title: |Security for Information Technology|
|Publication date: | Card |
---|
| Title: | Security for Information Technology | Publication date: | 2/5/2014 |
| |
| ||
h2.POLICY
h3.
h3.
h3.
h3.
h4.
# * *
## * *
## * *
# * * [ |https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Minimum+Security+Requirements]. Employees with specific roles must meet the [Role-Based Security Requirements|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Role-Based+Security+Requirements]. Employees and affiliates must meet any additional requirements and procedures that CSP determines are necessary to secure the Laboratory.
## [*Minimum Security Requirements*|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Minimum+Security+Requirements]. Minimum security requirements protect both the integrity of Laboratory Information and our network by providing a baseline level of protection for devices. Requirements may include training, security patches, passwords, media protection, anti-virus protection, physical protections, and network access.
## [*Role-based Security Requirements*|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Role-Based+Security+Requirements]. Certain roles require additional security requirements to protect Laboratory IT and Information. Roles include system administrators, web server owners, and application developers.
## *Other Requirements.* Employees and affiliates must adhere to additional requirements, standards, and procedures that the Cyber Security Program (CSP) determines are necessary to protect Laboratory IT and Information. Additional requirements are available on the CSP's [Security Requirements|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Cyber+Security+Requirements] page.
# *Reporting Security Incidents.* Employees and affiliates must follow the appropriate procedures to report cyber security incidents, including the loss or theft of Laboratory IT or Information.
h4.D.2 Laboratory Management
# Supervisors and managers must provide adequate oversight to ensure that employees and affiliates under their management are taking appropriate steps to secure Laboratory IT and Information throughout its lifecycle.
# The division or department director must ensure that the division adheres to policies, requirements, and procedures related to securing Laboratory IT and Information.
# The division or department director must designate a Computer Security Liaison who has authority and responsibility for coordination of computer security activities.
h4.D.3 Exceptions and Enforcement
# *Exceptions to Security Requirements*
## Some systems, most commonly scientific ones, are unable to meet the security requirements. Possible reasons include:
### *Technical.* For example, a legacy operating system that does not have patches for some vulnerability.
### *Operational.* For example, a device that performs experiments, such as genome sequencing or systems used in the Advanced Light Source (ALS) control, may have uptime requirements such that they cannot be patched or rebooted.
### *Cost-efficiency.* For example, the cost, either monetarily or for mission reasons, of upgrading a device to meet requirements exceeds the security benefit.
## *Exceptions.* Employees and affiliates should take a risk-based approach to using exceptions and seek guidance from CSP as appropriate. CSP may refuse exceptions based on institutional risk or require compensating controls.
# *Enforcement.* Employees and affiliates who do not comply with this policy may temporarily be denied access to Laboratory IT and may be subject to other penalties and disciplinary action up to and including termination. Non-compliant devices may be disconnected from the Laboratory network until the device is compliant.
h4.D.4 Cyber Security Program
The CSP has the authority and responsibility to support the security of Laboratory IT and Information. The program must:
# Provide general protection for Laboratory IT and Information that is risk-based, cost-effective, and supports the mission of the Laboratory
# Establish requirements, standards, procedures, and guidelines to help secure Laboratory IT and Information and comply with applicable regulations and requirements
# Provide information and resources to help Laboratory divisions and employees meet their security responsibilities
# Elicit input from divisions and programs on security policies and procedures
Although CSP supports the security of Laboratory IT and Information, ultimate responsibility for security and its implementation rests with each employee and affiliate.
h3.E. Roles and Responsibilities
Employees and affiliates must adhere to this policy. The table below describes specific responsibilities, authorities, and accountabilities by role:
|*Role*|*Responsibility*|*Authority*|*Accountability*|
|Director|Oversees site management and operations|Delegates cyber protection responsibilities (to CIO)|Accountable to DOE and UCOP for site operations|
|Chief Information Officer (CIO)|* Oversees institutional Cyber Security Program \\
* Oversees cyber security policy and related oversight activities|* Designates the CSM \\
* Directs resources to prioritize cyber security efforts|Accountable to Director for cyber security performance and policy|
|Deputy CIO for Technology and Policy|* Approves and directs the institutional Cyber Security Program \\
* Ensures that the Cyber Security Program is effectively managing risk|* Establishes cyber security policy \\
* Establishes risk management approach|Accountable to CIO for cyber security performance|
|Cyber Security Manager (CSM))|* Manages the institutional Cyber Security Program \\
* Evaluates overall cyber security posture and direction for Berkeley Lab \\
* Recommends security controls to CIO and Deputy CIO|* Directs resources to cyber protection efforts \\
* Establishes cyber security requirements|Accountable to CIO and Deputy CIO for cyber security performance|
|Cyber Security Program (CSP)|Develops and operates the institutional Cyber Security Program|Recommends and enforces cyber security requirements|Accountable to CSM for cyber security performance|
|Computer Security Liaisons|* Advise in the development of Cyber Security Program by representing their division \\
* Communicate cyber security policies and requirements to their divisions|Recommend changes to cyber security policy and requirements|Accountable to division line management for contributions to cyber security posture|
|Supervisors and Managers|Ensure safety and security of employees and systems within span of control|Direct work and resources to operate in a safe and secure manner|Accountable to defined line manager for cyber security performance within span of control|
h3.F. Definitions/Acronyms
|*Term*|*Definition* |
|Laboratory IT|Berkeley Lab-managed IT, including computing devices, networks, services, and accounts|
|Laboratory Information|Information used to accomplish job-related tasks; information may be owned by the Regents of University of California or the Department of Energy.|
h3.G. Recordkeeping Requirements
None
h3.H. Implementing Documents
|*Document number*|*Title*|*Type*|
|10.01.002.001|[Minimum Security Requirements|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Minimum+Security+Requirements]|Standard|
|10.01.002.002|[Role-based Security Requirements|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Role-Based+Security+Requirements]|Standard|
|10.01.002.003|[Security Requirements|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/Security+Requirements]|Standard |
| 11.04.003.000| [Financial Management System (FMS) User Access control|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/rpm2/Financial+Management+System+%28FMS%29+User+Access+Control]|Policy|
h3.I. Contact Information
Information Technology Policy Manager
Information Technology Division
[[email protected]|mailto:[email protected]]
h3.J. Revision History
|*Date*|*Revision*|*By whom*|*Revision Description*|*Section(s) affected*|*Change Type*|
|1/2/2012|0|J. Bonaguro|Rewrite for wiki (brief)|All|Minor|
|7/30/2012|1|J. Bonaguro|Rewrite for wiki (policy)|All|Minor|
|2/5/2014|1.1|J. Bonaguro|Periodic review|All|Minor|
{dojo-tab}
{dojo-tab:title=Document Information}
h2.DOCUMENT INFORMATION
|Title: |Security for Information Technology|
|Document number|10.01.002.000|
|Revision number|1.1|
|Publication dates: |2/5/2014|
|Effective date: |3/20/2007|
|Next review date:|3/1/2015|
|Policy Area:|Information Technology|
|RPM Section (home)|Information Management|
|RPM Section (cross-reference)|Sections 9.01 and 9.02|
|Functional Division|Information Technology|
|Prior reference information (optional)|RPM Sections 9.01 and 9.02|
h3.Source Requirements Documents
* DOE O 205.1B, _Department of Energy Cyber Security Management{_}, CRD
* DOE P 205.1, _Departmental Cyber Security Management Policy_
* UCOP IS-3 _Electronic Information Security_
h3.Implementing Documents
|*Document number*|*Title*|*Type*|
|10.01.002.001|Minimum Security Requirements|Requirements|
|10.01.002.002|Role-Based Security Requirements|Requirements|
|10.01.002.003|Security Requirements|Requirements|
| 11.04.003.000| [Financial Management System (FMS) User Access control|https://commons.lbl.gov/display/rpm2/Financial+Management+System+%28FMS%29+User+Access+Control]|Policy|
{dojo-tab}
{builder-show:group=rpm2-admins}
{dojo-tab:title=Additional Information}
h2.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|Title: |Security for Information Technology|
|Document number|10.01.002.000|
|Revision number|1.1|
|Publication dates: |2/5/2014|
|Effective date: |3/20/2007|
|Next review date:|3/1/2015|
|Policy Area:|Information Technology|
|RPM Section (home)|Information Management|
|RPM Section (cross-reference)|Sections 9.01 and 9.02|
|Functional Division |Information Technology|
|Author name/contact info|J. Bonaguro|
| | |
|Revision 0 publication date|3/20/2007|
|Retirement date|n/a|
|Prior reference information (optional)|RPM Sections 9.01 and 9.02|
| | |
|Inputs from more than one Functional Area?|No|
|List additional Functional Areas & contacts| |
| | |
|Inputs from more than one Policy Area?|No|
|List additional Policy Areas & contacts| |
| | |
|30-day notification needed?|No|
|30-day start date|n/a|
|30-day end date|n/a|
| | |
|LDAP protected?|No|
| | |
|Need TABL reminders?|No|
|Frequency|n/a|
|Brief reminder text:|n/a|
| | |
|Approval Sheet for this revision received (date) \\
\[Note: author is responsible\}| |
h3.Key labels/tags:
* (Policy Area 1), (Policy Area 2), (Section)
h3.New terms that need to be added to Glossary/Acronym list:
h3.Implementing Documents restricted to department/functional use
(optional – these will be used for tracing between requirements and associated documents)
|Document number|Title|
\\
\\
*Side bars:*
Side bar 1 location (cite by Policy Section # - for example: Section D.2.a)
Sidebar 1 text:
\\
Sidebar 2 location
Sidebar 2 text:
\\
Sidebar 3 location
Sidebar 3 text:
{dojo-tab}
{builder-show}
{dojo-tabs}- . Employees with specific roles must meet the Role-Based Security Requirements. Employees and affiliates must meet any additional requirements and procedures that CSP determines are necessary to secure the Laboratory.
- Minimum Security Requirements. Minimum security requirements protect both the integrity of Laboratory Information and our network by providing a baseline level of protection for devices. Requirements may include training, security patches, passwords, media protection, anti-virus protection, physical protections, and network access.
- Role-based Security Requirements. Certain roles require additional security requirements to protect Laboratory IT and Information. Roles include system administrators, web server owners, and application developers.
- Other Requirements. Employees and affiliates must adhere to additional requirements, standards, and procedures that the Cyber Security Program (CSP) determines are necessary to protect Laboratory IT and Information. Additional requirements are available on the CSP's Security Requirements page.
- Reporting Security Incidents. Employees and affiliates must follow the appropriate procedures to report cyber security incidents, including the loss or theft of Laboratory IT or Information.
- Supervisors and managers must provide adequate oversight to ensure that employees and affiliates under their management are taking appropriate steps to secure Laboratory IT and Information throughout its lifecycle.
- The division or department director must ensure that the division adheres to policies, requirements, and procedures related to securing Laboratory IT and Information.
- The division or department director must designate a Computer Security Liaison who has authority and responsibility for coordination of computer security activities.
- Exceptions to Security Requirements
- Some systems, most commonly scientific ones, are unable to meet the security requirements. Possible reasons include:
- Technical. For example, a legacy operating system that does not have patches for some vulnerability.
- Operational. For example, a device that performs experiments, such as genome sequencing or systems used in the Advanced Light Source (ALS) control, may have uptime requirements such that they cannot be patched or rebooted.
- Cost-efficiency. For example, the cost, either monetarily or for mission reasons, of upgrading a device to meet requirements exceeds the security benefit.
- Exceptions. Employees and affiliates should take a risk-based approach to using exceptions and seek guidance from CSP as appropriate. CSP may refuse exceptions based on institutional risk or require compensating controls.
- Enforcement. Employees and affiliates who do not comply with this policy may temporarily be denied access to Laboratory IT and may be subject to other penalties and disciplinary action up to and including termination. Non-compliant devices may be disconnected from the Laboratory network until the device is compliant.
The CSP has the authority and responsibility to support the security of Laboratory IT and Information. The program must: - Provide general protection for Laboratory IT and Information that is risk-based, cost-effective, and supports the mission of the Laboratory
- Establish requirements, standards, procedures, and guidelines to help secure Laboratory IT and Information and comply with applicable regulations and requirements
- Provide information and resources to help Laboratory divisions and employees meet their security responsibilities
- Elicit input from divisions and programs on security policies and procedures
Although CSP supports the security of Laboratory IT and Information, ultimate responsibility for security and its implementation rests with each employee and affiliate. Employees and affiliates must adhere to this policy. The table below describes specific responsibilities, authorities, and accountabilities by role: Role | Responsibility | Authority | Accountability | Director | Oversees site management and operations | Delegates cyber protection responsibilities (to CIO) | Accountable to DOE and UCOP for site operations | Chief Information Officer (CIO) | - Oversees institutional Cyber Security Program
- Oversees cyber security policy and related oversight activities
| - Designates the CSM
- Directs resources to prioritize cyber security efforts
| Accountable to Director for cyber security performance and policy | Deputy CIO for Technology and Policy | - Approves and directs the institutional Cyber Security Program
- Ensures that the Cyber Security Program is effectively managing risk
| - Establishes cyber security policy
- Establishes risk management approach
| Accountable to CIO for cyber security performance | Cyber Security Manager (CSM)) | - Manages the institutional Cyber Security Program
- Evaluates overall cyber security posture and direction for Berkeley Lab
- Recommends security controls to CIO and Deputy CIO
| - Directs resources to cyber protection efforts
- Establishes cyber security requirements
| Accountable to CIO and Deputy CIO for cyber security performance | Cyber Security Program (CSP) | Develops and operates the institutional Cyber Security Program | Recommends and enforces cyber security requirements | Accountable to CSM for cyber security performance | Computer Security Liaisons | - Advise in the development of Cyber Security Program by representing their division
- Communicate cyber security policies and requirements to their divisions
| Recommend changes to cyber security policy and requirements | Accountable to division line management for contributions to cyber security posture | Supervisors and Managers | Ensure safety and security of employees and systems within span of control | Direct work and resources to operate in a safe and secure manner | Accountable to defined line manager for cyber security performance within span of control |
Term | Definition | Laboratory IT | Berkeley Lab-managed IT, including computing devices, networks, services, and accounts | Laboratory Information | Information used to accomplish job-related tasks; information may be owned by the Regents of University of California or the Department of Energy. |
None Information Technology Policy Manager Information Technology Division [email protected] J. Revision HistoryDate | Revision | By whom | Revision Description | Section(s) affected | Change Type | 1/2/2012 | 0 | J. Bonaguro | Rewrite for wiki (brief) | All | Minor | 7/30/2012 | 1 | J. Bonaguro | Rewrite for wiki (policy) | All | Minor | 2/5/2014 | 1.1 | J. Bonaguro | Periodic review | All | Minor |
|
Card |
---|
label | Document Information |
---|
| Title: | Security for Information Technology | Document number | 10.01.002.000 | Revision number | 1.1 | Publication dates: | 2/5/2014 | Effective date: | 3/20/2007 | Next review date: | 3/1/2015 | Policy Area: | Information Technology | RPM Section (home) | Information Management | RPM Section (cross-reference) | Sections 9.01 and 9.02 | Functional Division | Information Technology | Prior reference information (optional) | RPM Sections 9.01 and 9.02 |
- DOE O 205.1B, Department of Energy Cyber Security Management, CRD
- DOE P 205.1, Departmental Cyber Security Management Policy
- UCOP IS-3 Electronic Information Security
|
Builder show |
---|
| Card |
---|
label | Additional Information |
---|
| Title: | Security for Information Technology | Document number | 10.01.002.000 | Revision number | 1.1 | Publication dates: | 2/5/2014 | Effective date: | 3/20/2007 | Next review date: | 3/1/2015 | Policy Area: | Information Technology | RPM Section (home) | Information Management | RPM Section (cross-reference) | Sections 9.01 and 9.02 | Functional Division | Information Technology | Author name/contact info | J. Bonaguro | | | Revision 0 publication date | 3/20/2007 | Retirement date | n/a | Prior reference information (optional) | RPM Sections 9.01 and 9.02 | | | Inputs from more than one Functional Area? | No | List additional Functional Areas & contacts | | | | Inputs from more than one Policy Area? | No | List additional Policy Areas & contacts | | | | 30-day notification needed? | No | 30-day start date | n/a | 30-day end date | n/a | | | LDAP protected? | No | | | Need TABL reminders? | No | Frequency | n/a | Brief reminder text: | n/a | | | Approval Sheet for this revision received (date) [Note: author is responsible} | |
- (Policy Area 1), (Policy Area 2), (Section)
(optional – these will be used for tracing between requirements and associated documents)
Side bars: Side bar 1 location (cite by Policy Section # - for example: Section D.2.a) Sidebar 1 text: Sidebar 2 location Sidebar 2 text: Sidebar 3 location Sidebar 3 text:
|
|
|