RPM | REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES MANUAL

Viewable by the world

    Title:

    Requirements Management Policy

    Publication date:

    10/6/2023

    Effective date:

    10/1/2023

    BRIEF

    Policy Summary

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) must establish and maintain a system for managing the UC-DOE Prime Contract for the management and operation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory requirements and their flow-down into Laboratory policies, programs, processes, and procedures.

    Who Should Read This Policy

    • The Laboratory Director and the Deputy Director for Operations and their direct reports
    • Berkeley Lab employees assigned to monitor, interpret, and/or determine detailed implementation of the portions of Contract 31 applicable to the respective Senior Line Manager's responsibilities

    To Read the Full Policy, Go To:

    The POLICY tab on this wiki page.

    Related Policy:

    Document Management Policy

    Contact Information

    Requirements Management Program Manager

    Office of Institutional Assurance and Integrity

    [email protected]

    Title:

    Requirements Management Policy

    Publication date:

    10/6/2023

    Effective date:

    10/1/2023

    POLICY

    A. Purpose

    This policy calls for the establishment and maintenance of a system for managing Contract 31 requirements and their flow-down into Laboratory policies and procedures.

    B. Persons Affected

    The results of this policy directly affect all members of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) community. However, a far smaller set of persons drive implementation of this policy, including the Laboratory Director, the Deputy Director for Operations, and their direct reports; and designated Berkeley Lab employees who are Subject Matter Experts assigned to monitor, interpret, and support implementation of contract requirements across the Laboratory and/or within their respective divisions.

    C. Exceptions

    Not applicable

    D. Policy Statement

           1. General

    Berkeley Lab must establish and maintain a system for managing the requirements set forth in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and University of California (UC) Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 (Contract 31) as specified by the DOE and UC contracting officers. The system for managing requirements must at lease include controls for:

    1. Defining information that flows from requirements through the Laboratory policies and supporting documents;
    2. Identifying, tracking, and communicating contract requirements information;
    3. Ensuring that information is accurate, current, and accessible; and
    4. Ensuring that information is easy to read, comprehend, and apply in the course of performing work.

    An Institutional Requirements Management Committee (RMC) is established to provide centralized coordination and communications on all matter related to Contract 31 requirements management and related Laboratory policy administration. (See documents 04.04.001.002, LBNL Requirements Management Governance; and 04.04.001.003, LBNL Requirements Management Process, for more information.)

          2. Tracking Contract Deliverables 

    Tracking of deliverables submitted by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) is a key process in order to provide assurance that LBNL meets the terms of the Prime Contract (Contract 31) between UC and the Department of Energy (DOE). Contract deliverables are tangible, measurable products or results delivered to the BSO, DOE or another outside party that acts on behalf of DOE. These include, but are not limited to:

    • reports,
    • plans,
    • inventories,
    • assessments,
    • inspections,
    • documents,
    • procedures,
    • data.

    In general, contract deliverables are  specific, tangible contract requirements and subject to the Laboratory's requirements management processes. The frequency of deliverable submission can vary and in most cases is triennial, annual, quarterly, or monthly. Deliverables can also be triggered by specific events or be required on demand without any specific due date, and are listed as “No Due Date” deliverables. It is the responsibility of the deliverable owners, assurance managers or points-of-contact and their functional organizations to submit deliverables timely as prescribed in Contract 31 according to due dates established by the Prime Contract or guidance from the DOE Site Office (BSO). All deliverable submissions are tracked in the Contract Deliverables Tracker (CDT), which is maintained by the Office of Institutional Assurance and Integrity. Deliverable submissions are considered DOE records and subject to requirements set forth in DOE O 243.1C “Records Management Program.” All questions and inquiries regarding contract deliverables tracking process should be directed to OIAI Requirements Management Program Manager or [email protected].

    E. Roles and Responsibilities

    The Laboratory Director and the Deputy Director for Operations and their direct reports are expected to provide financial and resource support for the establishment and maintenance of a Requirements Management (RM) System.

    Role Responsibility
    DOE Berkeley Site Office (BSO)
    • Actively participates in tri‐party evaluations of Contract 31 resulting in formal modifications to the Contract.

    OIAI Requirements Management Program Manager

    • Responsible for capturing contract deliverables into the institutional deliverable tracking database.
    • Responsible for maintaining integrity, accuracy, and completeness of the deliverable tracking database system, including performing quality checks.
    • Champions RM processes, tools, and practices in the incorporation of contract deliverables.
    • Interfaces with assurance POCs and deliverable owners on timely submission of deliverables, including sending regular reminders and resolving any submission and quality assurance issues.

    Function or Division Assurance POC

    • Participates in the efforts to incorporate Contract Mod changes including deliverables into institutional deliverables tracker. 
    • Submits or assists deliverable owners with timely and accurate submission of contract deliverables.
    • Works with OIAI to resolve any submission or quality assurance issues. 

    Function or Division Deliverable Owner

    • Responsible for a Contract 31 requirement assigned by line management, which may include translating of the requirement into implementation, managing the implementation process or program, completing, and submitting an associated deliverable, and/or adjusting supporting docs in the event of change.
    • Takes direction from respective Assurance POC or RMC representative regarding Contract 31 modifications.
    • Has responsibility to analyze and confirm respective Contract 31 Mod line item(s) including disposition of associated deliverables, and provide written recommendations on implementation plans to incorporate line-item changes into Lab polices, processes, etc. 
    • Submits or assists Assurance POC with timely and accurate submission of contract deliverables.
    • Has responsibility to adhere to the RM and Document Management processes.
    Requirements Management Committee (RMC)
    • The RMC provides centralized coordination and communication on Contract 31 requirements and related Laboratory policy matters and monitors, interprets, and if necessary, determines detailed implementation of Contract 31 following the Institutional RM Program process and procedures.

    F. Definitions/Acronyms

    Term

    Definition

    Contract 31

    "Contract 31" is short for Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 between the U.S. Department of Energy and the University of California describing the terms for management of Berkeley Lab. The contract includes a statement of work (SOW) for the science missions and details the requirements for managing the operations and business of Berkeley Lab.

    Deliverable

    Work product or output, resulting from addressing a requirement, that is provided to the contracting agency as demonstration of compliance to the requirement.

    Document

    Written, visual, audio-, or video-recorded information stored in the form of hard copy, film, magnetic tape, electronic data, or in an online, web-based format

    Implementing Document

    A document required to carry out a policy, process, procedure, system, or work instruction Examples: Expense form, Corrective Action Tracking System (CATS) Database User Manual, Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) Division Chemical Storage Guidelines

    Institutional Document

    A publication authorized by Laboratory management that delineates Laboratory-wide or multifunctional policy, procedures, regulations, or plans. A subset of authoritative documents. Scientific and technical publications and reports are not included in this definition. Examples: Procurement policy, Radiation Protection Program

    Policy

    Statements or directives from the federal, state, or local government; the University of California; or Berkeley Lab senior management that set a course of action, define acceptable conduct, or implement governing principles Example: Berkeley Lab Site Access

    Requirement

    A specific obligation to perform an action mandated by Berkeley Lab senior management or the University of California or the federal, state, or local government, or an obligation to comply with the Laboratory's contract with the U.S. Department of Energy

    G. Recordkeeping Requirements

    Deliverable submissions are considered DOE records and subject to requirements set forth in DOE O 243.1C “Records Management Program.” 

    H. Implementing Documents

    Document Number

    Title

    Type

    04.04.001.002

    LBNL Requirements Management Governance

    System

    04.04.001.003

    LBNL Requirements Management Process

    Process

    04.04.001.101

    Analyzing Requirements, Risk and Impact Procedure

    Procedure

    04.04.001.102

    Developing, Reviewing, Approving an Implementation Plan

    Procedure

    04.04.001.201

    Analyzing Requirements, Risk and Impact Form

    Form

    04.04.001.202

    Implementation Plan Form

    Form

    04.04.001.206

    Significance Rating Determination Form

    Form

    10.06.001.000

    Document Management Policy

    Policy

    I. Contact Information

    Requirements Management Program Manager

    Office of Institutional Assurance and Integrity

    [email protected]

    J. Revision History

    Date

    Revision

    By Whom

    Revision Description

    Section(s) Affected

    Change Type

    10/6/2023 2 D. Soustin Periodic review: added a section on contract deliverables tracking. Updated definitions, R&Rs and implementing documents sections. D, E, F, H Major
    12/17/2020
    D. Soustin Updated Contract 31 I clause numbers as per mod 1105 SRD Editorial

    11/9/2020

    1

    M. Baumbach

    Periodic review. Clarified policy text and role of the RMC. Updated contact information and A&I office name.

    All

    Minor

    3/6/2017

    0.2

    M. Stoufer

    "Chief Operating Officer" position title updated to "Deputy Director for Operations"

    All

    Editorial

    7/18/2014

    0.1

    L.Young

    Reviewed 7/18. Minor clarifications. Add link to RMC Charter.

    Section D, H

    Minor

    1/2/2012

    0

    L.Young

    Release for publication in wiki

    all

    Major

    DOCUMENT INFORMATION

    Title:

    Requirements Management Policy

    Document number

    04.04.001.000

    Revision number

    2

    Publication date:

    10/6/2023

    Effective date:

    10/1/2023

    Next review date:

    10/5/2026

    Policy Area:

    Requirements Management

    RPM Section (home)

    Contractor Performance Management

    RPM Section (cross-reference)

    none

    Functional Division

    OIAI

    Prior reference information (optional)

    none

    Source Requirements Documents



    • No labels